Can They Really Stop You From Joining a New Job? The Truth Behind Non-Compete Clauses (Tejas Karia Case)

A contract may bind your time, but it cannot chain your future. Your right to grow, earn, and dream is not negotiable—it’s protected by law.

A Powerful Truth from the Tejas Karia Case (Delhi High Court, June 2025)

You’ve found a dream job.

You serve your full notice period.

You imagine walking into your new office, hopeful and ready to start fresh.

But just before that moment, a court order arrives.

You’re told you can’t join.

Not because you’ve done anything wrong.

But because a clause buried deep in your old employment contract says so.

Unfair? Scary? Surreal?

Welcome to the reality one Indian engineer lived through, and fought back against.

This blog is for every professional who has ever signed a contract without reading the fine print, or felt trapped by legal jargon that didn’t seem fair.

Today, we’re breaking down a landmark Delhi High Court decision like you’re sitting with a trusted lawyer-friend, over chai.

The Engineer Who Just Wanted to Move On

Let’s start with the story.

An IT engineer (let’s call him the Appellant) was working with a private tech company that had a contract with Digital India Corporation (DIC), a government-backed project.

The engineer was doing well—he’d even led the impactful POSHAN Tracker project. But in January 2025, like many of us eventually do, he decided to move on.

After serving his full 3-month notice, he accepted a General Manager role with DIC. A proud step forward.

But instead of congratulations, he got... a court injunction.
His former employer dragged him to court, saying he violated a non-compete clause in his contract.

The Clause That Changed Everything

The company pointed to this clause in his contract:

"The employee shall not, directly or indirectly, take up employment with any Business Associate of the employer for a period of three years post-termination."

Now, since DIC was considered a “business associate”, they argued he was breaking the agreement by joining it.
They said:

• He had insider knowledge
• He could leak trade secrets
• Letting him join DIC could harm their business

The Trial Court agreed, and on 3rd June 2025, passed an interim injunction.
Just like that, the engineer was stopped from starting his new life.

But He Fought Back: Because It Wasn’t Fair

The engineer, through his lawyer, stood his ground.
He said:

• “My contract ended in April. You have no hold over me now.”
• “The project I worked on belongs to DIC, not to you.”
• “Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act says post-employment restrictions are void.”

And he was right.

He relied on a powerful Supreme Court judgment:

“Any agreement that restricts trade, even partially, is void.”
(Superintendence Co. v. Krishan Murgai, 1981)
The heart of his argument?

“You can’t take away my right to earn a living.”

What the High Court Said: Truth Prevails

Justice Tejas Karia of the Delhi High Court looked at the facts, and gave a judgment that echoes through every boardroom and HR department in India.
Here’s what the Court said loud and clear:

1. Post-Employment Non-Compete Clauses Are VOID

   Unless you're selling the goodwill of a business, you cannot be stopped from working after you resign.
   No matter how "reasonable" the clause looks, Indian law doesn’t allow it.

2. No Real Confidential Info Was at Risk

   The Court found no evidence that the engineer had access to any proprietary data that belonged to the employer.
   In fact, all IP rights for POSHAN Tracker were owned by DIC, not the company.

3. Right to Livelihood Comes First

   The Court said something we all feel deep down:
   “Stopping someone from working after they’ve moved on can destroy their finances, career, and dignity.”

   He had EMIs. He had responsibilities. He had dreams.
   And no contract can legally block that.

4. Foreign Laws Don’t Apply Here

   The company tried to cite English judgments (where some non-compete clauses are allowed).

   But India has its own laws, and Section 27 is crystal clear: post-employment restraints don’t hold water.

5. Allegations Can’t Justify Unfairness

   Even if the employer claimed misconduct, the Court said that’s not enough to enforce an illegal clause.

Final Verdict: Justice Delivered (June 25, 2025)

The Delhi High Court ruled:

• The injunction was quashed
• The engineer was free to join DIC
• No costs imposed
• All pending issues were closed

What This Means for You

If you're reading this with a job offer letter in one hand and an old contract in the other, take a deep breath.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. Most Non-Compete Clauses Are Not Enforceable in India

   No matter how fancy the wording, you cannot be forced to sit idle after leaving a job.

2. Your Right to Work is a Fundamental Right

   Indian courts prioritize your ability to earn, especially in a country where employment is deeply tied to dignity and survival.

3. Confidentiality Still Matters

   If you misuse trade secrets or client data, you can be held accountable.
   But not just for joining a new company.

4. Don’t Be Intimidated, Know Your Rights

   Contracts are written in legal language, but laws are written to protect real people like you.

Final Thoughts: Your Career, Your Freedom

This case is more than just a legal win, it’s a reminder.

• That you are not bound by fear, just because you signed a job contract.
• That a better job is your right, not a privilege granted by your old employer.
• That the law stands with you, when your intentions are fair and your integrity is intact.

So, if you're switching jobs, or facing pressure over a non-compete clause, remember this:

👉 You can walk forward.

👉 You can fight back.

👉 And you are allowed to grow.

Explore more blogs at Multigyan.in
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates